SOUTH YORKSHIRE

Burghwallis

SE5112

Three forts; late 1st - 2nd century date.  Crop-marks of two superimposed Roman forts, one larger than the other

Doncaster
Danum

SE5703

A Flavian fort, 2.6 ha;
abandoned circa 120 AD;
a 2.4 ha fort, built mid 2nd century;
the final fort, 2.4 ha, dates from the late 3rd - 4th century;
garrisoned by Equites Crispiani (late 4th century)

Site of two Roman forts; a Flavian one and a smaller Trajanic/Hadrianic, fort which appears to have been occupied to the end of the Roman period, the defences of the vicus been excavated, also a Medieval lime kiln.  Roman Altar 98 - 399; Roman Fort 69 - 96; Roman Fort 98 - 399

Doncaster
Austerfield

Temporary campsite of a square enclosure, interpreted as a Roman camp; Roman coins and weapons were found in the area. The site has probably been destroyed by quarrying.

Rossington (Bridge)

SK6399

Vexillation fortress, 9.3 ha (23 acres); Flavian or earlier.  A large fort, possibly dating to the time of the invasion or shortly after, it was capable of housing up to 2,500 men.

4½ miles south west of Doncaster, there is dating evidence of early construction, soon after the Claudian invasion in the year 43.  Frere suggests a link with the quelling of Cartumandua, the Brigantian queen, which might explain its size, its location, and its apparent early date.
Templeborough

SK4191

A timber fort, 2.6 ha, circa 55 AD; a square plan fort measured 495 feet by 490 feet was surrounded by a turf rampart built on gravel, with an outer ditch 18 feet wide.  Exact dating evidence had not survived.

Trajanic fort, 2.1 ha, with stone wall held until circa 180 AD; second stone fort, 1.8 ha, possibly held until mid 4th century; it was reduced in size from the earlier, measuring 380 feet by 440 feet and surrounded by a 9 feet thick stone wall fronted by a single ditch.  The latest dating evidence are coins possibly Constantine, 307 - 337.

Garrisoned by Cohors IV Gallorum equitata (early 2nd century) for which there is epigraphic evidence

Wales

SK 58

Fort

The site of as possible Roman auxiliary fort is indicated by finds of pottery usually associated with military contexts; excavations at the site uncovered the remains of kiln assumed to be located in a vicus.  

PAGE LAST UPDATED 07/09/03

 

 

Designed by Richard Hayton 2006
email richard@yorkshirehistory.com